This study utilizes the text mining method to deconstruct and assemble the text of Fang Fang’s Wuhan Diary, and applies Fairclough’s Critical Discourse Analysis model to analyze the discourse structure and aspects of Wuhan Diary. The results of the analysis, show that informational discourse, opinion and argumentative discourse are selectively deployed in the ‘title + text’ structure of Wuhan Diary. Words such as “武汉” and “疫情”and words such as “愤怒”, “武汉 人”, “医生朋友”, and “极左” were selected as key words. The discursive practices were categorized into: 1. Informational discourse on the ‘Wuhan lockdown situation’; 2. Informational discourse on the ‘corona situation in the Wuhan area’; 3. Opinion and argumentation discourse on the ‘blame for response failure’; 4. Daily life and tragedy of the locked-down citizens; 5. ‘Attack of dissenters’ intertextuality discourse. The “extreme left” discourse of opposing opinions was decontextualized into the “hate and conflict” discourse outside of the text. The significance of this study is that it attempts to derive the macro context of the whole text by utilizing big data analysis in Chinese text research methods, and attempts a new research method to derive the discourse practice in depth by applying Critical Discourse Analysis in the field of sociolinguistics.

이 연구는 텍스트마이닝 방법을 활용하여 팡팡의 우한일기 텍스트를 해체, 조합 하고 페어클로프의 비판적 담론 분석(Critical Discourse Analysis) 모형을 적용, 우 한일기의 담론 구조와 양상을 분석하였다. 분석 결과, 우한일기 ‘제목+본문’ 구조 에서 정보성 담론과 의견과 주장 담론을 선택적 배치하였다. ‘武汉’, ‘疫情’ 등 단어와 ‘愤怒, ‘武汉人’, ‘医生朋友’, ‘极左’ 등 단어가 핵심어로 선정되었다. 담론적 실천은 1. ‘우한 봉쇄 상황’ 정보성 담론, 2.‘우한 지역의 코로나 상황’ 정보성 담론, 3.‘대응 실패 책임론’ 의견, 주장의 담론, 4.‘봉쇄된 시민의 일상과 비극’ 정보와 주장 혼합 담론, 5. ‘반대 의견자의 공격’ 상호텍스트성 담론이 도출되었다. 반대 의견의 ‘极左’ 담론은 텍스트 밖에서 ‘증오와 갈등’ 담론으로 탈·접합되었다.